Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMcDunnough, J.
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-03T11:21:15Z
dc.date.available2020-09-03T11:21:15Z
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholar.oxy.edu/handle/20.500.12711/10048
dc.description.abstractThe recent receipt of a good number of Euphydryas forms in the editha group has led me to check up rather carefully on the identity of the parent form editha Bdv. and its so-called type locality, as given by Gunder in his Revision of the genus (1929, Pan Pacific Ent. VI, 1-8, Pis. I-XVI). On one of his maps (PI. 15) it is noted that editha is "typical in Kern Co." but with this statement I must emphatically disagree, and would venture the suggestion that the type-localities for editha Bdv. and rubicunda Hy. Edw. have been transposed and that typical editha should be looked for in Mariposa Co. and the adjacent regions, whilst the race in Kern Co. is more nearly approached to rubicunda than to anything else.
dc.subjectLepidoptera
dc.subjectRhopalocera
dc.subjecttaxonomy
dc.titleOn the Identity and Type Locality of Euphydryas editha (Lep. Rhop.)
dc.title.alternativeIdentity and Type Locality of Euphydryas editha
dc.typearticle
dc.abstract.formatonep
dc.source.beginpage1
dc.source.issuescas/vol35/iss1
dc.source.issue1
dc.identifier.legacyhttps://scholar.oxy.edu/scas/vol35/iss1/2
dc.source.endpage2
dc.source.peer_reviewedTRUE
dc.source.statuspublished
dc.source.volume35
dc.source.journaltitleScas: Bulletin of the Southern California Academy of Sciences


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record