• Login
    View Item 
    •   Oxy Scholar Home
    • Politics
    • Politics URC Student Scholarship
    • View Item
    •   Oxy Scholar Home
    • Politics
    • Politics URC Student Scholarship
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    U.S. Democracy Promotion in Egypt: a Critique of USAID

    Thumbnail
    Author
    McGinty, Meagan
    Issue
    urc_student
    Date
    2011-01-01
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    URI
    https://scholar.oxy.edu/handle/20.500.12711/1189
    Abstract
    The Egyptian Revolution of 2011 was an internal movement fueled by the conviction that change was necessary and could not happen within the existing government system. Although it is not yet clear how much democratic and developmental progress will result from the sudden regime change, international optimism abounds that the Egyptian people will achieve greater freedom. While it is clear that the Egyptian people took their destiny in their own hands, it is less clear what role, if any, other international actors played in this revolution. This presentation will investigate the role of the U.S. democracy promotion in Egypt's political system in the final years of Mubarak's regime by focusing on the USAID Office of Democracy and Governance as the main vehicle for democracy assistance. In the last decade, the U.S. increased democracy promotion in Egypt, but democracy ratings stagnated. Every country presents different constraints and requires a unique approach to democracy promotion. In Egypt constraints included bureaucracy within USAID, obstruction by the Egyptian government, and public antagonism to U.S. engagement. In addition, the U.S.'s strategic economic and security interests in Egypt contradicted democracy promotion. In response to these constraints, USAID's Office of Democracy and Governance was designed to foster limited democratic change from within the authoritarian government. USAID Democracy and Governance programs were not intended to cause or facilitate a popular movement. The actions carried out by USAID were limited, symbolic, and ultimately, reinforced the legitimacy of Mubarak's regime. Ignoring the actual demands of the people and the conditions for change necessary for democratic progress in Egypt served neither moral nor practical interests and undermined the foundations of U.S. democracy promotion.
    Collections
    • Politics URC Student Scholarship

    Browse

    All of Oxy ScholarCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsJournal TitleJournal IssueThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsJournal TitleJournal Issue

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2021  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    DSpace Express is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV