• Login
    View Item 
    •   Oxy Scholar Home
    • English and Comparative Literary Studies (ECLS)
    • English and Comparative Literary Studies (ECLS) URC Student Scholarship
    • View Item
    •   Oxy Scholar Home
    • English and Comparative Literary Studies (ECLS)
    • English and Comparative Literary Studies (ECLS) URC Student Scholarship
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    (I) Murder (You) in the Dark: Atwood?s Pronominal Re-vision of Lacan?s Mirror Stage

    Thumbnail
    Author
    Reed, Alison
    Issue
    urc_student; urc_student
    Date
    2007-01-01 0:00
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    URI
    https://scholar.oxy.edu/handle/20.500.12711/883
    Abstract
    The pronominal relation between I and You is shifty. While communication generally depends on denotative stability across time, place and speaker, some words drastically shift meaning according to their point of reference. In Murder in the Dark (1983), Margaret Atwood intentionally evades the contextualization of what semiotician Roland Barthes refers to as ?shifters.? In doing so, she acknowledges the central role pronouns play in feminist discourse. Gender battles over the second person pronoun evidence the intersection of pronominal shifters with literary and psychoanalytic theory. Psychoanalyst Jacques Lacan suggests a temporal framework for pronominal acquisition in ?The Mirror Stage as Formative of the I Function.? Lacan?s mirror stage describes the point at which the child first recognizes her or his image in the mirror.This visual image creates a fictional mold, or ?Ideal-I,? which excludes bodily processes such as aging, and creates a bound sense of self at odds with reality. This tension, between the psychological I and the biological You , serves as the foundation of Lacan?s construction of desire as constituted by lack Atwood renegotiates this paradigm by positing the I as speaking subject and the You as the speaking subject?s body. She then introduces the ?third eye,? or the body?s vision, to dissolve the boundary between the once mutually exclusive realms. The seeing and speaking body engenders a narrative model based not on lack but on desire as a productive force. Atwood?s subject, no longer split against itself, reconciles the dynamic body with its static mirror image.
    Collections
    • English and Comparative Literary Studies (ECLS) URC Student Scholarship

    Browse

    All of Oxy ScholarCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsJournal TitleJournal IssueThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsJournal TitleJournal Issue

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2021  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    DSpace Express is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV