• Login
    View Item 
    •   Oxy Scholar Home
    • English and Comparative Literary Studies (ECLS)
    • English and Comparative Literary Studies (ECLS) URC Student Scholarship
    • View Item
    •   Oxy Scholar Home
    • English and Comparative Literary Studies (ECLS)
    • English and Comparative Literary Studies (ECLS) URC Student Scholarship
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    The Systematic Misreading of Michel Foucault.

    Thumbnail
    Author
    Murata, Sherri
    Issue
    urc_student; urc_student
    Date
    2000-01-01 0:00
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    URI
    https://scholar.oxy.edu/handle/20.500.12711/907
    Abstract
    In the popular media we often find claims that for French philosophers in general, and Michel Foucault in particular, there is no such thing as truth. Foucault's assertion in the 1975 text Discipline and Punish that power and knowledge are inseparable, is taken to mean that all sciences are therefore arbitrary constructs, invented and perpetuated by tyrannical forces. However, Foucault's argument was not that knowledge itself is bad, or more importantly, false, but simply that it can never be disassociated from power relations. Much of the discussion about Foucault in the content of the so-called Science Wars. Alan Sokal, a physicist at New York University, began the war in 1996 with the publication of an article in the magazine Social Text parodying what he calls French post-modern thought. Few of the authors of French philosophy over the last 40 years who explicitly focus on science are referenced, most importantly is Foucault's The Birth of the Clinic. This text explicitly discusses the origin of the medical sciences, and how its development coincided with complex political, social and economic factors. Foucault argues that the traditional history of science chose to ignore the non-scientific conditions within which new ideas were produced to preserve an image of pure experiments, discovery and progress. Critics, such as Sokal, seem to believe that deviating from traditional history and acknowledging external factors somehow undermines existing scientific truth, when in fact, Foucault is exposing the real truth of how those truths came into existence.
    Collections
    • English and Comparative Literary Studies (ECLS) URC Student Scholarship

    Browse

    All of Oxy ScholarCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsJournal TitleJournal IssueThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsJournal TitleJournal Issue

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2021  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    DSpace Express is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV